Learn about the U.S. visa bond program for B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants, including requirements, amounts, refund conditions, and compliance obligations for designated countries.
Her Story
About Jacqueline
Jacqueline Lentini McCullough, J.D., is an accomplished immigration attorney at the Law Office of Jacqueline Lentini, LLC, in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where she has practiced immigration law for more than 26 years. She specializes in employment-based immigration, helping companies recruit and retain foreign nationals, particularly professionals in STEM fields, while also assisting individuals and families with the green card process, naturalization, and other complex immigration matters. Her interest in immigration law was sparked by her early work with international students at universities, building on her academic background in languages, cultures, and international relations.
Jacqueline earned a bachelor’s degree in International Relations, cum laude, from Boston University in 1988 and a master’s degree in Italian Studies from Brown University in 1992. She later earned her J.D. with a Certificate in International Law from Chicago-Kent College of Law, IIT, where she founded the Immigration Law Committee. Throughout her career, she has remained actively engaged in the immigration legal community as a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and has written and spoken extensively on immigration issues affecting businesses, universities, entrepreneurs, and individuals.
Jacqueline attributes her success to collaborating with trusted colleagues who serve as sounding boards in an area of law that changes rapidly and requires continuous learning. She believes in putting the client first, maintaining high standards of honesty and integrity, and working hard to achieve the best possible outcomes. As an advocate for aspiring women in the legal profession, she encourages young women entering immigration law to seek out experienced mentors who can provide guidance and support. While she recognizes that evolving immigration policies present significant challenges and uncertainty, she also sees opportunities to help more individuals and organizations navigate an increasingly complex immigration landscape.
Her Interview
Ten minutes with Jacqueline
01What do you attribute your success to?
I attribute my success to building strong relationships with colleagues who serve as trusted sounding boards for ideas, collaboration, and brainstorming. Because this area of law evolves rapidly, staying current and effective requires continuous learning and the ability to work collaboratively rather than in isolation. I value the perspectives and expertise of others, and I believe that sharing ideas and learning from colleagues has been essential to my professional growth and success.
02What’s the best career advice you’ve ever received?
The best career advice I have received is to always put the client first. It is important to remain focused on serving the client’s best interests rather than allowing pride or ego to get in the way. If I make a mistake, I believe in acknowledging it, taking responsibility, and focusing on finding the best solution. This mindset has helped me remain accountable, professional, and committed to providing the highest level of service.
03What advice would you give to young women entering your industry?
My advice to young women entering the legal industry is to find a mentor who can provide guidance, encouragement, and support throughout their careers. There are many experienced professionals who are genuinely willing to help those who are up and coming, and learning from someone you respect can be incredibly valuable. This is especially true in a specialized and constantly evolving area of law such as immigration, where the insight and perspective of a trusted mentor can help you develop your skills, navigate challenges, and grow with confidence.
04What are the biggest challenges or opportunities in your field right now?
The biggest challenge in immigration law right now is the rapidly changing policy environment and the current administration’s specific immigration agenda. Policies and procedures can change frequently, sometimes on a weekly basis, which creates significant uncertainty and anxiety for individuals navigating the immigration system. At the same time, this environment has created an opportunity to provide guidance and support, as more people are seeking answers and professional advice about their cases. I remain focused on helping clients understand these changes and navigate the complexities of immigration law with clarity and confidence.
05What values are most important to you in your work and personal life?
The values most important to me in both my work and personal life are honesty and a strong work ethic. As a solo attorney, hard work, dedication, and perseverance are essential to serving clients effectively and building a successful practice. I believe in being honest, taking responsibility, and consistently giving my best effort in everything I do.
Her Content Hub
Articles by Jacqueline
Visa Bonds for Certain B-1/B-2 Travelers: What Applicants Should Know
Understanding the financial guarantee requirement for B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants from designated countries.
U.S. Expands Visa Bond Requirements for Certain B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa Applicants
The U.S. Department of State has expanded its visa bond program for certain B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants. Depending on an applicant's country of nationality and individual circumstances, some travelers may now be required to post a financial bond before a visitor visa can be issued.
While the bond requirement does not apply to every applicant, it is an important policy that may affect travel planning for individuals from designated countries.
What Is a Visa Bond?
A visa bond is a financial guarantee required for certain applicants seeking a B-1/B-2 visitor visa.
If a consular officer determines that a bond is required, the applicant may be instructed to post one of the following amounts:
- $5,000
- $10,000
- $15,000
The amount is determined during the visa interview based on the applicant's individual circumstances.
Applicants should not submit a bond unless they are specifically instructed to do so by a U.S. consular officer.
Who May Be Affected?
The Department of State has designated certain countries whose nationals may be subject to the visa bond requirement.
Applicants from these countries who are otherwise eligible for a B-1/B-2 visitor visa may be required to post a bond before a visa can be issued.
Because the list of designated countries may change over time, applicants should verify the current requirements before applying.
How Does the Visa Bond Process Work?
If instructed by a consular officer, applicants must:
- Complete Form I-352, Immigration Bond.
- Use the official Pay.gov payment system through the link provided by the U.S. government.
- Follow all instructions provided by the consular officer.
The U.S. government advises applicants not to submit payments through third-party websites.
Does Paying a Bond Guarantee Visa Approval?
No.
Posting a visa bond does not guarantee that a visa will be approved. Applicants must still satisfy all eligibility requirements under U.S. immigration law.
Likewise, paying a bond without being instructed to do so will not result in visa issuance, and any fees paid may not be refunded.
Entry and Departure Requirements
Travelers who post a visa bond must comply with specific travel requirements.
They are generally required to:
- Enter and depart the United States through approved commercial airports, including CBP preclearance locations.
- Avoid using land border crossings, seaports, charter aircraft, or private aviation for entry or departure under the bond program.
Failure to comply with these requirements could affect compliance with the bond's terms and may result in forfeiture.
When Is the Bond Refunded?
According to the Department of State, the bond may be canceled and refunded if:
- The traveler departs the United States before their authorized period of stay expires.
- The traveler never uses the visa before it expires.
- The traveler is denied admission at a U.S. port of entry.
What Could Result in a Bond Breach?
The Department of Homeland Security may review cases in which the terms of the bond appear to have been violated.
Examples include:
- Remaining in the United States beyond the authorized period of stay.
- Failing to depart the United States as required.
- Certain changes in immigration status after entering the country.
If a violation is found, the bond may be forfeited.
Key Takeaway
For certain B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants, a visa bond may now be an additional step in the visa application process. Although posting a bond does not guarantee visa approval, understanding the requirements—including payment procedures, travel restrictions, and compliance obligations—can help applicants avoid unnecessary complications.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a U.S. visa bond?
A visa bond is a financial guarantee that certain B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants may be required to post before a visitor visa is issued.
How much is the visa bond?
The bond amount may be $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, depending on the applicant's individual circumstances and the consular officer's determination.
Does paying a visa bond guarantee visa approval?
No. A visa bond is only one part of the visa application process. Applicants must still qualify for a visitor visa under U.S. immigration law.
Can I pay the bond before my visa interview?
No. Applicants should only complete Form I-352 and submit the required payment after receiving instructions from a U.S. consular officer.
Can the visa bond be refunded?
Yes. The bond may be refunded if the traveler complies with its terms, such as departing the United States before their authorized period of stay expires or not using the visa before it expires.
If you believe the visa bond requirement may apply to your situation or you have questions about your eligibility for a U.S. visitor visa, it is important to understand your options before applying. To discuss your case, you may schedule a consultation with the Law Office of Jacqueline Lentini, LLC by calling 630-262-1435 or emailing jacki@lentinivisas.com.
DHS replaces Duration of Status with fixed admission periods for F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I visa holders, effective September 15, 2026. International students and exchange visitors must now track Form I-94 expiration dates and file Extension of Stay applications to remain lawful.
Department of Homeland Security Final Rule Ends Duration of Status (D/S): What F-1, J-1, and I Visa Holders Need to Know
Understanding the End of Duration of Status and What It Means for International Students and Exchange Visitors
DHS Ends Duration of Status for Many International Students, Exchange Visitors, and Foreign Media Representatives
For decades, many international students, exchange visitors, and foreign media representatives admitted to the United States were granted Duration of Status (D/S) on their Form I-94. Under this system, individuals could generally remain in the United States for as long as they maintained their immigration status and complied with the requirements of their program.
That is about to change.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published a final rule replacing the longstanding Duration of Status framework with fixed periods of admission for many F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I visa holders. The rule takes effect on September 15, 2026, and represents one of the most significant changes to these nonimmigrant classifications in decades.
What Is Changing?
Beginning September 15, 2026, many individuals entering the United States in F-1, J-1, or I status will no longer be admitted under Duration of Status.
Instead, they will generally receive a specific expiration date on their Form I-94.
For many F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors, admission will typically be granted for the length of the approved academic or exchange program, up to a maximum of four years, followed by the applicable grace period. Most I visa holders will receive admission for up to 240 days.
This means that maintaining lawful status will depend not only on continuing an approved program but also on ensuring that the authorized period of stay listed on the Form I-94 does not expire.
Why This Matters
Under the previous D/S system, schools and exchange program sponsors could often extend a participant's program without requiring a separate immigration application with USCIS.
Under the new rule, individuals who need additional time beyond their authorized admission period will generally need to file an Extension of Stay (EOS) application with USCIS before their Form I-94 expires.
This change may affect students who:
- Need additional time to complete their degree
- Participate in Optional Practical Training (OPT) or other authorized activities
- Continue research or exchange programs beyond their original admission period
Failing to request an extension before the authorized period of stay expires could place an individual at risk of falling out of status.
Transition Rules for Current Students and Exchange Visitors
Individuals who are already in the United States under Duration of Status when the rule takes effect generally will not be required to immediately apply for an Extension of Stay.
DHS has provided transition provisions allowing many current F-1 and J-1 nonimmigrants to continue under the existing D/S framework until their current program ends or until the transition period expires, whichever occurs first.
However, travel outside the United States during the transition period may affect how the new admission rules apply upon reentry. Because individual circumstances vary, careful planning is important before making international travel arrangements.
What Schools and Employers Should Know
Educational institutions, exchange program sponsors, and employers that rely on international students or exchange visitors should begin preparing for the new requirements now.
Organizations should consider:
- Tracking Form I-94 expiration dates rather than relying on Duration of Status
- Planning Extension of Stay filings well before expiration
- Reviewing onboarding and employment authorization procedures
- Educating affected students, researchers, trainees, and employees about the new requirements
Early preparation can help minimize interruptions to employment, research, and academic programs.
Key Takeaway
The end of Duration of Status marks a significant shift in how many F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I visa holders maintain lawful status in the United States. Although the rule does not take effect until September 15, 2026, affected individuals, schools, employers, and exchange program sponsors should begin understanding the new requirements and planning ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Duration of Status (D/S)?
Duration of Status allows certain nonimmigrants, including many F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors, to remain in the United States for as long as they maintain their approved immigration status instead of receiving a fixed expiration date.
When does the new rule take effect?
The DHS final rule takes effect on September 15, 2026.
Who is affected by this change?
The rule primarily affects many F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I visa holders entering the United States after the effective date, as well as certain individuals who travel internationally during the transition period.
Will I need to file an Extension of Stay?
If you need additional time beyond your authorized admission period, you will generally need to file an Extension of Stay (EOS) application with USCIS before your Form I-94 expires.
Does this rule immediately affect people already in the United States?
Not necessarily. DHS included transition provisions that allow many individuals already in F-1 or J-1 status to continue under the current D/S framework for a period of time. However, international travel during the transition period may change how the new rule applies upon reentry.
**If you have questions about how this final rule may affect your immigration status, educational institution, or organization, you may schedule a consultation with the Law Office of Jacqueline Lentini, LLC by calling 630-262-1435 or emailing jacki@lentinivisas.com.
The U.S. Department of State has expanded social media screening to additional nonimmigrant visa categories including K, R, T, U, Q, and H visas. Applicants must set profiles to public during vetting to ensure consistency with their immigration filings.
Department of State Expands Social Media Screening to Additional Visa Categories
DOS Expands Social Media Review to K, R, T, U, and Other Nonimmigrant Visa Categories Effective March 30, 2026
U.S. Department of State Expands Social Media Screening for Additional Nonimmigrant Visa Applicants
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) recently expanded its online presence review requirements to several additional nonimmigrant visa categories, increasing the number of applicants whose social media activity may be reviewed during the visa adjudication process.
The update took effect on March 30, 2026, and applies to a broad range of visa classifications, including fiancé(e) visas, religious worker visas, and certain humanitarian visa categories.
What Changed
According to a recent AILA Practice Alert, the DOS expanded its online presence review requirements to include applicants seeking:
- K-1, K-2, and K-3 visas
- R-1 and R-2 religious worker visas
- T visas for victims of human trafficking
- U visas for victims of certain crimes
- Q cultural exchange visas
- Certain domestic worker classifications, including A-3, C-3, and G-5 visas
- H-3 trainee visas and certain H-4 dependent visas
These categories now join H-1B, H-4, F, M, and J visa applicants, who were already subject to similar review requirements.
Social Media Accounts Must Be Set to "Public"
DOS guidance instructs applicants in the affected visa categories to make their social media profiles publicly accessible during the visa screening process.
The purpose of this requirement is to allow consular officers to review applicants' online activity as part of the visa vetting process.
According to the DOS, visa adjudications are national security decisions, and officers may use publicly available online information as part of their review.
Why This Matters
This expansion affects a much larger group of applicants than previous online screening initiatives.
In particular, it impacts:
- Fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens applying for K visas
- Religious workers and their dependents
- Applicants seeking humanitarian protection through T or U visas
- Cultural exchange participants and certain domestic workers
For many applicants, social media activity may now become a routine part of the consular review process.
What Applicants Should Consider
Applicants should ensure that information available on their public social media profiles is consistent with the information provided in their visa applications and supporting documentation.
For example, K-1 visa applicants often submit social media communications as evidence of a bona fide relationship. In these situations, applicants should be prepared for consular officers to review the same platforms referenced in their application materials.
Applicants should also avoid making changes to their social media accounts solely to conceal information after filing a visa application, as inconsistencies could raise additional questions during the adjudication process.
Potential Processing Delays
Because consular officers may conduct additional online reviews, some applicants could experience longer processing times.
The impact will likely vary depending on the visa category, the complexity of the case, and the volume of online content available for review.
Applicants should plan accordingly and allow additional time for visa processing whenever possible.
Key Takeaway
The Department of State has expanded its social media screening requirements to several additional nonimmigrant visa categories, including K, R, T, and U visas. Applicants should be prepared for online presence reviews as part of the visa adjudication process and ensure that publicly available information is consistent with their immigration filings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which visa categories are now subject to expanded social media screening?
The expanded review applies to several visa classifications, including K, R, T, U, Q, H-3, certain H-4 dependent visas, and select domestic worker visa categories. These categories join H-1B, H-4, F, M, and J visa applicants, who were already subject to similar review requirements.
Does this requirement apply to fiancé(e) visa applicants?
Yes. K-1, K-2, and K-3 visa applicants are included in the expanded review requirements.
DOS guidance instructs affected applicants to set their social media profiles to "public" (or other open privacy settings) during the visa screening process.
Will social media screening delay visa processing?
It may. Additional vetting steps can increase processing times, particularly in cases involving extensive online activity or additional review.
Should applicants delete social media content before their interview?
Applicants should be cautious about making changes solely to conceal information. Significant inconsistencies between online activity and immigration filings could raise questions during the adjudication process.
To discuss how these expanded screening requirements may affect your visa application or immigration strategy, you may schedule a consultation with the Law Office of Jacqueline Lentini, LLC by calling 630-262-1435 or emailing jacki@lentinivisas.com.
Join Influential Women and start making an impact. Register now.